Explore as a

Share our content

Information on the 2024 Marsden Fund round

An image of a neutrino event detected by sensors embedded deep in the ice, overlaid on a photo of the IceCube Laboratory (image credit: Jenni Adams)

Information about the number of funded proposals in the 2024 Marsden Fund round broken down by research area and institution, also including gender and ethnicity data

 

Published on 7 Whiringa-ā-rangi November 2024 

Number of applications by research area

The number of proposals by panel is given in Table 1. While overall 11.2% of the Expressions of Interest have been recommended for funding at the final stage, this percentage is not constant over all panels or categories as a change of just one proposal — attributed to either a Fast-Start or Standard award — in the number of successful proposals causes significant change in this percentage.

Here are the definitions of the 10 Marsden Fund panels

 

 

EoIs

Full

Proposed Contracts

Success Rate

 Panel

FS

SD

Tot.

FS

SD

Tot.

FS

SD

Tot.

FS

SD

Tot.

BMS

34

100

134

8

19

27

4

10

14

11.8%

10.0%

10.4%

CMP

20

68

88

4

15

19

3

7

10

15.0%

10.3%

11.4%

EEB

35

69

104

8

14

22

4

8

12

11.4%

11.6%

11.5%

EHB

37

53

90

8

11

19

4

7

11

10.8%

13.2%

12.2%

EIS

45

63

108

7

12

19

5

6

11

11.1%

9.5%

10.2%

ESA

32

61

93

8

12

20

4

6

10

12.5%

9.8%

10.8%

HUM

32

36

68

7

8

15

5

4

9

15.6%

11.1%

13.2%

MIS

36

63

99

8

13

21

4

7

11

11.1%

11.1%

11.1%

PCB

14

42

56

5

11

16

3

5

8

21.4%

11.9%

14.3%

SOC

69

96

165

12

22

34

7

9

16

10.1%

9.4%

9.7%

MFC

   

8

   

3

   

1

   

12.5%

Total

354

651

1013

75

137

215

43

69

113

12.1%

10.6%

11.2%

Table 1: Number of funded proposals by panel (and as a percentage of number of EOIs). For the purposes of clarity, the Marsden Fund Council Award has been presented as a panel (MFC) and is assessed by the Marsden Fund Council.

 

Proposals by organisation

 Organisations EoIs Full Funded Success Rate
  FS STD MFCA Tot. FS STD MFCA Tot. FS STD MFCA Tot. FS STD MFCA Tot.
CRI 44 61 0 105 8 5 0 13 6 3 0 9 13.6% 4.9%   8.6%
AgResearch 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0.0%   0.0%
GNS Science 13 8 0 21 6 0 0 6 4 0 0 4 30.8% 0.0%   19.0%
Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research 7 8 0 15 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 2 14.3% 12.5%   13.3%
NIWA 14 24 0 38 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 0.0% 4.2%   2.6%
Plant & Food Research 4 11 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0%   0.0%
Scion 3 3 0 6 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 33.3% 0.0%   16.7%
Institute of Environmental Science and Research 3 3 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0.0% 33.3%   16.7%
OTH (11 organisations) 6 11 0 17 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 16.7% 0.0%   5.9%
PRI (21 organisations) 15 19 0 34 4 4 0 8 1 2 0 3 6.7% 10.5%   8.8%
TEO 289 560 8 857 62 127 3 192 35 64 1 100 12.1% 11.4% 12.5% 11.7%
Auckland University of Technology 8 15 0 23 1 3 0 4 1 0 0 1 12.5% 0.0%   4.3%
Lincoln University 7 5 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0%   0.0%
Massey University 24 54 0 78 3 11 0 14 1 5 0 6 4.2% 9.3%   7.7%
The University of Auckland 78 155 4 237 20 37 0 57 9 19 0 28 11.5% 12.3% 0.0% 11.8%
University of Canterbury 48 78 1 127 6 12 0 18 3 7 0 10 6.3% 9.0% 0.0% 7.9%
University of Otago 47 131 2 180 14 34 2 50 7 15 1 23 14.9% 11.5% 50.0% 12.8%
University of Waikato 23 31 0 54 4 9 0 13 3 7 0 10 13.0% 22.6%   18.5%
Victoria University of Wellington 46 85 1 132 12 21 1 34 9 11 0 20 19.6% 12.9% 0.0% 15.2%
Unitec Institute of Technology 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0%   0.0%
Waikato Institute of Technology 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%     0.0%
Te Wānanga o Aotearoa 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0.0%   0.0%
New Zealand College of Chiropractic 2 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0%   0.0%
Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 100.0%     100.0%
Eastern Institute of Technology 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%     0.0%
Total 354 651 8 1013 75 137 3 215 43 69 1 113 12.1% 10.6% 12.5% 11.2%

Table 2: Number and percentages of funded proposals by institution, grouped by type of institution.  The ‘Other’ category includes not-for-profit research institutes and the ‘Private’ category includes individuals and companies.

 

Gender and Ethnicity Data

Table 3 presents the percentages of applicants who self-identify as either female or as Māori researchers in the Expressions of Interest, Full Applications and those proposals recommended for funding.

 

 

 

Investigators Identifying
as Female

Investigators Identifying
as Māori

Principal
Investigators

EoIs

42.2%

7.1%

Full

44.5%

9.5%

Funded

47.8%

11.9%

Associate
Investigators

EoIs

33.9%

8.0%

Full

35.7%

11.0%

Funded

33.5%

13.7%

All
Investigators

EoIs

37.0%

7.6%

Full

38.8%

10.4%

Funded

38.7%

13.1%

Table 3: Gender and ethnicity data for 2024. Please note, gender identity data is collected in accordance with Stats NZ's Standard classification of gender identity.

 

The following graphs present the engagement of female and Māori researchers in the Expressions of Interest and those proposals recommended for funding.

Line graph of percentage of investigators idetifying as female, applying to Marsden Fund, and successful.Figure 1: The percentage of responding Principal Investigators identifying as Female in the Marsden Fund.

 

Line graph of percentage of investigators identifying as Māori applying to the Marsden Fund, and successfulFigure 2: The percentage of responding Principal Investigators identifying as Māori in the Marsden Fund.