Explore as a

Share our content

Information on the 2021 Marsden Fund round

Information about the number of funded proposals in the 2021 Marsden Fund round broken down by research area and institution, also including gender and ethnicity data

 

Published on 3 Whiringa-ā-rangi November 2021 

Number of applications by research area

The number of proposals by panel is given in Table 1.  While overall 10.4% of the Expressions of Interest have been recommended for funding at the final stage, this percentage is not constant over all panels or categories as a change of just one proposal — attributed to either a Fast-Start or Standard award — in the number of successful proposals causes significant change in this percentage.

Here are the definitions of the 10 Marsden Fund panels

 

 

EoIs

Full

Proposed Contracts

Success Rate

 

FS

SD

Tot.

FS

SD

Tot.

FS

SD

Tot.

FS

SD

Tot.

Panel

                       

BMS

37

95

132

6

16

22

2

9

11

5.4%

9.5%

8.3%

CMP

27

59

86

6

11

17

4

6

10

14.8%

10.2%

11.6%

EEB

49

81

130

10

13

23

4

8

12

8.2%

9.9%

9.2%

EHB

42

79

121

10

13

23

5

8

13

11.9%

10.1%

10.7%

EIS

46

68

114

11

14

25

6

7

13

13.0%

10.3%

11.4%

ESA

33

65

98

9

13

22

5

6

11

15.2%

9.2%

11.2%

HUM

40

59

99

8

10

18

4

7

11

10.0%

11.9%

11.1%

MIS

30

68

98

6

15

21

3

8

11

10.0%

11.8%

11.2%

PCB

24

54

78

8

9

17

3

5

8

12.5%

9.3%

10.3%

SOC

81

107

188

18

21

39

8

11

19

9.9%

10.3%

10.1%

MFC

   

8

   

1

   

1

   

12.5%

Total

409

735

1152

92

135

228

44

75

120

10.8%

10.2%

10.4%

Table 1: Number of funded proposals by panel (and as a percentage of number of EOIs).  For the purposes of clarity, the Marsden Fund Council Award has been presented as a panel (MFC) and is assessed by the Marsden Fund Council.  

Proposals by institution

 

EoI

Full

Fund

Success Rate

 

FS

SD

MFCA

Total

FS

SD

MFCA

Total

FS

SD

MFCA

Total

FS

SD

MFCA

Total

CRI

32

43

1

76

4

7

0

11

1

3

0

4

3.1%

7.0%

0.0%

5.3%

AgResearch

2

5

0

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.0%

0.0%

 

0.0%

GNS Science

8

5

0

13

1

1

0

2

1

0

0

1

12.5%

0.0%

 

7.7%

ESR

3

4

0

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.0%

0.0%

 

0.0%

Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research

3

5

1

9

0

1

0

1

0

1

0

1

0.0%

20.0%

0.0%

11.1%

NIWA

13

19

0

32

3

5

0

8

0

2

0

2

0.0%

10.5%

 

6.3%

Plant and Food Research

2

5

0

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.0%

0.0%

 

0.0%

Scion

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.0%

   

0.0%

OTHER (8 institutions)

2

15

0

17

2

0

0

2

1

0

0

1

50.0%

0.0%

 

5.9%

PRIVATE (13 institutions)

17

14

1

32

2

2

0

4

1

1

0

2

5.9%

7.1%

0.0%

6.3%

TEO

358

663

6

1027

84

126

1

211

41

71

1

113

11.5%

10.7%

16.7%

11.0%

Auckland University of Technology

12

20

0

32

3

5

0

8

1

3

0

4

8.3%

15.0%

 

12.5%

Lincoln University

10

8

0

18

2

0

0

2

2

0

0

2

20.0%

0.0%

 

11.1%

Massey University

43

83

1

127

12

11

0

23

6

5

0

11

14.0%

6.0%

0.0%

8.7%

The University of Auckland

97

169

2

268

25

36

1

62

10

20

1

31

10.3%

11.8%

50.0%

11.6%

University of Canterbury

34

69

0

103

6

14

0

20

3

9

0

12

8.8%

13.0%

 

11.7%

University of Otago

55

162

0

217

14

35

0

49

6

18

0

24

10.9%

11.1%

 

11.1%

University of Waikato

33

48

1

82

7

7

0

14

3

4

0

7

9.1%

8.3%

0.0%

8.5%

Victoria University of Wellington

71

103

2

176

15

18

0

33

10

12

0

22

14.1%

11.7%

0.0%

12.5%

Ara Institute of Canterbury

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.0%

   

0.0%

Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.0%

   

0.0%

Unitec Institute of Technology

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

0.0%

 

0.0%

Te Wānanga o Aotearoa

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.0%

   

0.0%

Grand Total

409

735

8

1152

92

135

1

228

44

75

1

120

10.8%

10.2%

12.5%

10.4%

Table 2: Number and percentages of funded proposals by institution, grouped by type of institution.  The ‘Other’ category includes not-for-profit research institutes and the ‘Private’ category includes individuals and companies.

Gender and Ethnicity Data

Table 3 presents the percentages of applicants who self-identify as either female or as Māori researchers in the Expressions of Interest, Full Applications and those proposals recommended for funding.

   

Proportion of Responding Investigators Identifying
as Māori

Proportion of Responding Investigators Identifying
as Female

Principal
Investigators

EoIs

5.6%

34.0%

Full

8.0%

39.3%

Funded

9.3%

37.0%

Associate
Investigators

EoIs

6.8%

32.5%

Full

8.5%

33.6%

Funded

8.7%

33.9%

All
Investigators

EoIs

6.3%

34.9%

Full

8.3%

38.1%

Funded

8.9%

37.1%

Table 3: Gender and ethnicity data for 2021. Please note, gender identity data is collected in accordance with Stats NZ's Standard classification of gender identity.

The percentage of Principle Investigators identifying as Māori in the Marsden Fund for 2021 Figure 1: The percentage of responding Principal Investigators identifying as Māori in the Marsden Fund for the 2021 round.

The percentage of responding Principal Investigators identifying as Female in the Marsden Fund in 2021.

Figure 2: The percentage of responding Principal Investigators identifying as Female in the Marsden Fund for the 2021 round.